Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the imported Electronic Power Steering- Electronic Control Unit (EPS-ECU) was classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8708 94 00 as a part of motor vehicle power steering system or under Customs Tariff Item 9032 90 00 as claimed by the appellant.
Analysis: The dispute was identical to the earlier appeals decided in the appellant's own case. The Tribunal noted that the earlier final order had already held EPS-ECU to be a part of the power steering system and not an instrument or apparatus falling under Chapter 90. It further noted that subsequent Chennai Bench decisions on different ECUs did not alter the position because classification depends on the specific goods and the present ECU was identical to the one previously considered. In these circumstances, the earlier decision continued to govern the issue.
Conclusion: EPS-ECU was correctly classifiable under CTI 8708 94 00 and not under CTI 9032 90 00. The finding was against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue.