Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned classification order could be permitted to operate when an earlier order in the petitioner's own case had accepted classification of the same type of spice mixes under heading 09109100, and whether interim protection against coercive action was warranted.
Analysis: The earlier adjudication in the petitioner's own matter had accepted the classification of mixed spice products under heading 09109100 and had attained acceptance in departmental proceedings. The later order departed from that position without following the principle of judicial discipline, despite the same broad product category and the need for consistency in classification. The Court found prima facie substance in the contention that the later approach appeared perverse and inconsistent with the earlier accepted view. Pending further consideration and a reply affidavit from the respondent, the Court granted interim protection against coercive steps under the impugned order.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted interim relief and coercive action under the impugned order was stayed until the next date of hearing.