CTH classification amendment under Section 149 requires reassessment by proper officer not administrative action

CESTAT Chennai held that amendment of Bills of Entry under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962 to change CTH classification for refund of excess duty requires reassessment by proper officer rather than administrative action. The tribunal noted that changing CTH impacts duty calculation, import permissibility, and various exemptions, effectively constituting reassessment after original assessment concluded. While acknowledging appellant's right to seek amendment under Section 149, the tribunal emphasized that such changes affecting final assessment should follow proper reassessment procedures. The matter was remanded to proper officer to process amendment request and conduct reassessment through speaking order, following natural justice principles, with appellant eligible for consequential refund if any.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Amendment of Bills of Entry u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962.
2. Reassessment and classification of imported goods.
3. Eligibility for refund of excess customs duty paid.

Summary:

1. Amendment of Bills of Entry u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962:
The appellant, M/s. Valeo India Pvt. Ltd., sought to amend Bills of Entry (BE) under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, to correct an erroneous classification of imported parts of lighting equipment. The initial classification under CTH 85122010/20 led to a higher customs duty, whereas the correct classification should have been under CTH 85129000. The request for amendment was initially rejected by the Assistant Commissioner and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).

2. Reassessment and Classification of Imported Goods:
The Assistant Commissioner rejected the amendment request, stating that the goods were rightly classified under CTH 85122020 as "other automobile lighting equipment" and that reassessment post-clearance is not permissible unless appealed. The appellant argued that the reassessment could be done under Section 149 based on documentary evidence existing at the time of clearance. The Tribunal examined whether changing the CTH post-assessment amounts to reassessment and found that such an amendment impacts the duty calculation, making it a substantive change rather than a procedural one.

3. Eligibility for Refund of Excess Customs Duty Paid:
The appellant's claim for a refund of excess duty paid was contingent on the amendment of the BE. The Tribunal noted that as per the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in ITC Ltd. v. CCE, self-assessment could be modified under Section 128 or other relevant provisions of the Act. The Tribunal also considered various High Court judgments, including those from the jurisdictional Madras High Court, which allowed amendments under Section 149 for the purpose of claiming refunds.

Final Judgment:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the proper officer to process the appellant's request for amendment of the BE under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962. The proper officer is directed to reassess the goods and issue a speaking order, allowing the appellant to claim a consequential refund if applicable. The process should be completed within ninety days, following the principles of natural justice.

---