Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2001 (10) TMI 297 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Trust granted tax exemption under section 11 based on amended Trust Deed and changed public perception. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee Trust is eligible for exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act. This decision was based on the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Trust granted tax exemption under section 11 based on amended Trust Deed and changed public perception.

                          The Tribunal concluded that the assessee Trust is eligible for exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act. This decision was based on the significant amendments made to the Trust Deed in 1989, the registration granted under section 12A, and the changed public perception of Acharya Rajneesh's teachings. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the decision favored the assessee Trust.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the assessee is a public charitable trust eligible for exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act.
                          2. The impact of the amendments made to the Trust Deed on the eligibility for exemption.
                          3. The significance of the registration under section 12A.
                          4. The relevance of the changed public perception of the teachings of Acharya Rajneesh.
                          5. The effect of the earlier Tribunal decisions on the current assessment year.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Public Charitable Trust and Eligibility for Exemption:
                          The primary issue is whether the assessee qualifies as a public charitable trust eligible for exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal examined the aims and objects of the Trust as outlined in the Trust Deed and subsequent amendments. The original Trust Deed included various activities aimed at spreading the teachings of Acharya Rajneesh and other philosophers, which the Tribunal previously found to be partly non-charitable due to the nature of the teachings and the profit-oriented activities.

                          2. Impact of Amendments to the Trust Deed:
                          Significant amendments were made to the Trust Deed in 1989, including:
                          - Deletion of the clause appointing Acharya Rajneesh as a life-time advisor.
                          - Removal of clauses that gave Acharya Rajneesh de facto control over the Trust.
                          - Deletion of the clause authorizing the Trust to print and sell books, which was seen as a profit-oriented activity.
                          - The amended clause 5(a) now reads: "To spread and impart preachings of philosophers, thinkers, and scholars both past and contemporary (including Acharya Rajneesh) pertaining to all religions, and/or main principles thereof for the spiritual, mental and/or moral and physical betterment of human beings with the ultimate object of self-realisation."

                          The Tribunal found these amendments significant as they addressed the objections raised in earlier decisions, particularly the clauses giving control to Acharya Rajneesh and the profit-oriented activities.

                          3. Significance of Registration under Section 12A:
                          The Trust was granted registration under section 12A by the CIT, Pune, effective from 18-12-1997. The Tribunal noted that this registration, granted after the amendments to the Trust Deed, indicated that the CIT was satisfied with the charitable nature of the Trust's objects and the genuineness of its activities. This registration was seen as a strong ground for treating the Trust as charitable in nature.

                          4. Changed Public Perception of Teachings of Acharya Rajneesh:
                          The Tribunal acknowledged the changed public perception of Acharya Rajneesh's teachings. His works have been widely studied, translated into various languages, and accepted by reputed institutions such as the Parliament Library and universities that have established chairs for the study of his philosophy. This change in perception was considered significant in determining the charitable nature of the Trust's activities.

                          5. Effect of Earlier Tribunal Decisions:
                          The earlier decisions of the Tribunal, including the TMB's order, were based on the original Trust Deed and the then-prevailing perception of Acharya Rajneesh's teachings. The Tribunal recognized that the amendments to the Trust Deed and the changed public perception of the teachings warranted a fresh evaluation of the Trust's eligibility for exemption. The Tribunal concluded that the earlier decisions could not be automatically applied to the current assessment year due to these significant changes.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal, considering the amendments to the Trust Deed, the grant of registration under section 12A, and the changed public perception of Acharya Rajneesh's teachings, concluded that the assessee Trust is eligible for exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the issue was decided in favor of the assessee.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found