Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1997 (6) TMI 76 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee's Reasonable Cause Canceled Penalties The assessee had a reasonable cause for the delay in obtaining audit reports for the assessment years 1987-88 and 1988-89 due to the illness and death of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assessee's Reasonable Cause Canceled Penalties

                          The assessee had a reasonable cause for the delay in obtaining audit reports for the assessment years 1987-88 and 1988-89 due to the illness and death of key personnel. The penalties under section 271B of the Income Tax Act were found unjustified, and the orders cancelling the penalties were confirmed, as the assessee proved the existence of reasonable cause under section 273B.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the assessee had a reasonable cause for the delay in obtaining audit reports for the assessment years 1987-88 and 1988-89 under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Whether the penalties levied under section 271B of the Income Tax Act were justified.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Reasonable Cause for Delay in Obtaining Audit Reports:

                          Assessment Years 1987-88 and 1988-89:
                          - The audit reports were due by 31-7-87 and 31-7-88 respectively, but were actually signed on 2-8-88 and 20-10-89, resulting in delays.
                          - The assessee argued that the delays were due to the illness of their Chartered Accountant, Shri H.P. Lala, and the departure of the firm's accountant.
                          - It was also submitted that the main partner died on 16-11-84, which disrupted the management and led to delays in statutory formalities.
                          - The CIT(A) found merit in these explanations and held that there was a reasonable cause for the delays, cancelling the penalties.

                          2. Justification of Penalties under Section 271B:

                          Department's Appeal:
                          - The Department argued that the assessee could have employed another auditor or accountant if the original auditor was unwell.
                          - The Department's representative emphasized that the provisions of section 271B are absolute and penalties should be levied for non-compliance.

                          Assessee's Defense:
                          - The assessee reiterated that changing the auditor was not easy and the illness of the Chartered Accountant was a significant factor.
                          - It was noted that for assessment year 1986-87, the audit report was delayed but no penalty was initiated, indicating the Department's acceptance of reasonable cause.
                          - The assessee also pointed out that penalty proceedings for assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91 were dropped, showing the genuineness of the explanation.

                          Tribunal's Findings:
                          - The Tribunal acknowledged the struggles faced by the assessee due to the illness and subsequent death of the main partner and the Chartered Accountant.
                          - It was noted that normalcy was restored by assessment year 1991-92, indicating that the duration of disruption was not excessive.
                          - The Tribunal held that there was a reasonable cause for the delay in finalizing the audit reports for the two years under consideration and confirmed the orders of the CIT(A), dismissing the Department's appeals.

                          Dissenting Opinion:
                          - A dissenting opinion was provided, arguing that the provisions of section 271B are absolute and the assessee failed to discharge the onus of proving reasonable cause under section 273B.
                          - The dissenting member emphasized that the explanation provided by the assessee was vague and unsubstantiated, and the penalties should be confirmed.

                          Third Member's Decision:
                          - The Third Member agreed with the majority view that the illness of the Chartered Accountant and the death of the main partner constituted reasonable cause for the delays.
                          - It was held that the penalties should be deleted as the assessee had proved the existence of reasonable cause under section 273B.

                          Conclusion:
                          - The majority view held that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the delay in obtaining the audit reports due to the illness and death of key personnel.
                          - The penalties under section 271B were not justified, and the orders of the CIT(A) cancelling the penalties were confirmed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found