Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can be sustained and recovered from the estate of a deceased assessee when the penalty proceedings were initiated and concluded during the assessee's lifetime.
Analysis: The liability of a legal representative under section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 extends to sums that the deceased assessee would have been liable to pay, and the provision is broader than the corresponding language in section 24B of the Income-tax Act, 1922. On that basis, penalty proceedings for a default committed by a deceased person may be started or continued against the legal representative. However, section 159(4) limits recovery from the estate to tax liability. Penalty is treated as quasi-criminal in nature and is imposed to punish the wrongdoer, so recovery of penalty from the legal representative's inherited estate would amount to penalising the legal representative for the deceased's default. Since the penalty was already imposed during the assessee's lifetime, the issue was confined to recoverability from the estate, and that recovery was held impermissible.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 271B could not be recovered from the estate of the deceased assessee, and the impugned penalty order was set aside with a direction to delete the penalty.