Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether house rent allowance received by an assessee residing in his own house, without actually incurring rent expenditure, is exempt under section 10(13A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Analysis: The exemption under section 10(13A) is available only where the assessee actually incurs expenditure by way of rent in respect of residential accommodation occupied by him. Rule 2A also proceeds on the basis of actual rent expenditure and prescribes monetary limits for determining the amount exempt. On that construction, the allowance cannot be exempted where no rent is paid and no hired residential accommodation exists, as in the case of an assessee living in his own house. The reliance placed on the earlier decisions was not accepted, and the Tribunal held that the statutory requirement of actual expenditure was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The house rent allowance of Rs. 4,800 was not exempt under section 10(13A) read with rule 2A, and the assessee's claim failed.
Final Conclusion: The revenue's challenge succeeded because exemption for house rent allowance was confined to cases of actual rent outgo, which was absent here.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption of house rent allowance under section 10(13A) is contingent on actual expenditure on rent for residential accommodation; where the assessee resides in self-owned premises without incurring rent, the allowance is not exempt.