Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1982 (12) TMI 75 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows enforceable liability but disallows extra payment as business expenditure. The Tribunal upheld the allowance of Rs. 4,52,344 as a revenue expenditure, considering it an enforceable liability created by the assessee. However, the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal allows enforceable liability but disallows extra payment as business expenditure.

                            The Tribunal upheld the allowance of Rs. 4,52,344 as a revenue expenditure, considering it an enforceable liability created by the assessee. However, the deduction of Rs. 9,58,969 for an extra payment of 0.80 paise per share was disallowed. The Tribunal deemed this payment as compensation for delays and non-payment of dividends, not interest, and therefore not allowable as a business expenditure. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the enforceable liability but rejecting the characterization of the extra payment as interest.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Whether the liability of Rs. 4,52,344 created by the assessee on the amount retained from the compensation payable to outgoing shareholders is an enforceable legal liability.
                            2. Whether the extra payment of 0.80 paise per share to erstwhile shareholders is in the nature of interest and allowable as a business expenditure.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Enforceable Legal Liability of Rs. 4,52,344:

                            The assessee, a limited company formerly known as 'Punjab National Bank Ltd.', underwent a name change to 'P. N. B. Finance Limited' following the nationalization of its banking business. Post-nationalization, the company offered to purchase its own shares from shareholders at Rs. 40 per share, retaining Rs. 6.90 per share to cover potential tax liabilities. The retained amount was used in the company's financing business, and the company made a provision of Rs. 4,52,344 for interest on this retained amount.

                            The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed this provision as a deduction, reasoning that the liability was enforceable and the provision was made in accordance with the mercantile system of accounting. The liability was considered a contractual obligation, authorized by the board of directors' resolution and endorsed by the general body of shareholders.

                            The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that the retained amount was used for business purposes, and the interest was paid wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal referenced the judgments in Bombay Steam Navigation Co. and Rohtas Industries Ltd. to support the admissibility of the interest deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that the sum of Rs. 4,52,344 should be allowed as a revenue expenditure.

                            2. Nature of Extra Payment of 0.80 Paise per Share:

                            The company decided to pay an additional 0.80 paise per share to erstwhile shareholders due to delays in finalizing the scheme for share purchase. This payment was initially treated as interest and tax was deducted at source under section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the deduction of Rs. 9,58,969, considering it a business expenditure incurred due to the delay in payment to shareholders.

                            However, the Tribunal disagreed with this characterization. It noted that the payment of 0.80 paise per share was not interest but rather compensation for the delay and non-payment of dividends for the year 1973. The Tribunal referenced the Law of Income-tax in India by V. S. Sundaram, which distinguishes interest as the price for the use of money from compensation payments. The Tribunal concluded that this payment could not be allowed under section 36(1)(iii) or section 37, as it was not made wholly and exclusively for business purposes. It was either part of the purchase price of the shares or compensation for non-payment of dividends.

                            The Tribunal vacated the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order regarding the deduction of Rs. 9,58,969 and restored the ITO's disallowance, concluding that the payment was not a revenue expenditure incurred for business purposes.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal upheld the allowance of Rs. 4,52,344 as a revenue expenditure but disallowed the deduction of Rs. 9,58,969, considering it as compensation rather than interest. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the enforceable liability of the retained amount but rejecting the characterization of the extra payment as interest.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found