Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for a non-resident shipping company assessed under section 44B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the capital base for surtax purposes was to be computed under rule 4 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 on the basis of the proportion of Indian income to world income, or whether rule 4 was inapplicable and the capital had to be computed under the other applicable rules of the Second Schedule.
Analysis: Rule 4 applies only where a part of the income, profits and gains of a company is not includible in its total income as computed under the Income-tax Act. For a non-resident shipping company governed by section 44B, the profits and gains are computed on the special statutory basis introduced by that provision, and the ordinary computation contemplated by rule 4 is not attracted. The capital base therefore had to be worked out under rules 1 to 3, as applicable, rather than by the proportion of Indian income to world income.
Conclusion: Rule 4 was held inapplicable and the computation adopted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected; the capital base was to be recomputed under the appropriate provisions, in favour of Revenue.