Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1984 (6) TMI 92 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Income Tax Rectification for Unregistered Firms The Tribunal upheld the ITO's rectification under sections 154 and 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the inclusion of the assessee's share of ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Upholds Income Tax Rectification for Unregistered Firms

                            The Tribunal upheld the ITO's rectification under sections 154 and 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the inclusion of the assessee's share of income from initially unregistered firms that later obtained registration. The Tribunal deemed the rectification valid, emphasizing that changes in the firms' status post-appellate order impacted partners' taxable income, justifying the rectification under section 154. The Tribunal highlighted the complexities of assessing firms, distinguishing between registered and unregistered firms in terms of tax implications for partners. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, affirming the rectification within the specified time frame under section 155(1)(a).




                            Issues:
                            1. Rectification proceedings under section 154 read with section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Whether the inclusion of the assessee's share of income from two unregistered firms was a mistake apparent from the records.
                            3. Competency of the Income Tax Officer (ITO) to assume jurisdiction under section 154.
                            4. Time limitation for passing orders under section 154.
                            5. Interpretation of section 155(1) regarding the reassessment of a firm and its impact on partners' income.
                            6. Calculation of partners' shares in registered and unregistered firms.
                            7. Assessment procedure for firms and its complexity.
                            8. Applicability of section 155(1) in cases involving variation in tax burden and partners' share incomes.
                            9. Time frame for rectification under section 155(1)(a) based on the final order passed in the case of the firm.

                            Analysis:
                            The judgment dealt with rectification proceedings under sections 154 and 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning the inclusion of the assessee's share of income from two initially unregistered firms. The ITO initiated rectification proceedings as the firms were later granted registration, resulting in a different income figure for the assessee. The ITO argued that even if section 155(1) was not directly applicable, he could rectify the mistake under section 154, considering the change in the assessee's income post-registration of the firms. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the ITO's order, leading to the assessee's appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

                            The main contention raised by the assessee was that the inclusion of income based on unregistered status was not a mistake apparent from the records, especially since the registration of the firms was under challenge. The assessee also argued that the rectification by the ITO was time-barred. However, the Tribunal found little merit in these arguments, emphasizing that the determination of a firm's status was integral to the assessment process, impacting partners' taxable income. The Tribunal highlighted that a change in a firm's status post-appellate order constituted a change in partners' taxable income, justifying the rectification under section 154.

                            The Tribunal further delved into the complexities of assessing firms, distinguishing between registered and unregistered firms in terms of tax implications for partners. The Tribunal agreed that the assessment of a firm involved multiple steps, including the allocation of income among partners, with tax implications varying based on the firm's status. The Tribunal also cited relevant case law to support the interpretation of section 155(1) in cases involving variations in tax burdens and partners' share incomes, emphasizing the importance of considering appellate orders in the assessment process.

                            In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, concurring with the ITO's rectification under section 154 based on the change in the firms' status and its impact on the assessee's income. The Tribunal affirmed that the rectification was within the time frame specified under section 155(1)(a), considering the final order passed in the case of the firms. The judgment underscored the intricacies of assessing firms and the significance of considering changes in status and income allocation in partners' assessments.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found