<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 92 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60268</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the ITO&#039;s rectification under sections 154 and 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the inclusion of the assessee&#039;s share of income from initially unregistered firms that later obtained registration. The Tribunal deemed the rectification valid, emphasizing that changes in the firms&#039; status post-appellate order impacted partners&#039; taxable income, justifying the rectification under section 154. The Tribunal highlighted the complexities of assessing firms, distinguishing between registered and unregistered firms in terms of tax implications for partners. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the rectification within the specified time frame under section 155(1)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:48:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 92 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60268</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the ITO&#039;s rectification under sections 154 and 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the inclusion of the assessee&#039;s share of income from initially unregistered firms that later obtained registration. The Tribunal deemed the rectification valid, emphasizing that changes in the firms&#039; status post-appellate order impacted partners&#039; taxable income, justifying the rectification under section 154. The Tribunal highlighted the complexities of assessing firms, distinguishing between registered and unregistered firms in terms of tax implications for partners. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the rectification within the specified time frame under section 155(1)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>