Sub-partnership in liquor business held valid where it only shared a partner's interest and did not breach licence restrictions.

A sub-partnership confined to financing a partner's share in a licensed liquor business and sharing the profits and losses of that share did not make the sub-partners partners in the main firm. Section 14 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abkari Act was aimed at preventing a lessee from introducing an unlicensed partner into the liquor business, not at such internal profit-sharing arrangements. On the facts, the sub-partnership did not itself carry on liquor business or violate the licence restriction, so it was not unlawful under the Abkari Act. Being genuine and valid, it was entitled to registration under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

---

---

Issues: Whether a sub-partnership formed by partners of a licensed liquor business, for financing and sharing the profits and losses of one partner's share in the main firm, was hit by section 14 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abkari Act, 1316F, and whether such sub-partnership was entitled to registration under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The sub-partnership did not make the sub-partners partners of the main firm. Its arrangement was confined to financing the partner's share in the main business and sharing the profits and losses accruing to that partner from the main firm. The prohibition in section 14 of the Abkari Act was directed against a lessee declaring another person as partner in the liquor business without permission, and against competence to act as such without licence. On the facts found, the sub-partnership was not carrying on liquor business in its own name and did not amount to an unlawful partnership for the purposes of the Abkari Act. Since the sub-partnership was genuine and valid, it could be registered under the Income-tax Act.

Conclusion: The sub-partnerships were not illegal under section 14 of the Abkari Act and were entitled to registration under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Final Conclusion: The appeals failed and the Revenue's challenge to registration was rejected, leaving the assessee-sub-partnerships entitled to registration.

Ratio Decidendi: A sub-partnership limited to sharing the income or loss of a partner's interest in the main firm, without itself carrying on the prohibited liquor business or violating the licence restriction, is valid and registrable under the Income-tax Act.

---