Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a sub-partnership formed by a partner in a liquor business, solely to finance that partner's share and receive a portion of profits and losses from the main firm, is illegal or void under the Abkari law and therefore disentitled to registration under the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: A sub-partnership is a partnership inter se between the partner of the main firm and the sub-partners; it does not make the sub-partners partners of the main firm. Registration depends on the genuineness and legal existence of the sub-partnership and not on whether the beneficial income is later shared among others. The prohibition in the Abkari law applies only where the sub-partnership itself carries on liquor business without the requisite licence or permission. On the facts found, the sub-partnership did not conduct liquor business, but only financed the partner's share in the licensed main firm and shared the income and losses arising from that share. The authorities relied on by the department were distinguished because they dealt with arrangements that directly carried on the prohibited business without the required authority.
Conclusion: The sub-partnerships were valid and entitled to registration under the Income-tax Act.