Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was liable to be assessed only on half the income from the Abkari contracts, or whether the entire income was assessable in the hands of the assessee and the other participant as an association of persons.
Analysis: The partnership in the Abkari business was formed without the prior approval required by section 14 of the Hyderabad Abkari Act and was therefore void. An illegal partnership could not claim the benefits available to a registered firm under section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922. On the facts found, both persons joined in carrying on the business for the common purpose of earning profits, and the arrangement satisfied the legal test of an association of persons. Income arising from such a joint venture was liable to be assessed under section 3 of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to be assessed on only half the income. The entire income from the Abkari contracts was assessable as the income of an association of persons, and the answer to the reference was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where two persons knowingly carry on a profit-making venture in association, the income is assessable as that of an association of persons under section 3 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, notwithstanding that the underlying partnership is void or unregistered under the governing excise law.