Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on common inputs could be denied when the manufacturer had paid an amount equal to 8% of the price of the exempted final products under Rule 57CC.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the interaction between Rule 57C and Rule 57CC. Rule 57C(1) bars credit on inputs used in exempted final products, but Rule 57C(2) deems that requirement satisfied where the manufacturer complies with Rule 57CC, including payment of the prescribed 8% amount. The Tribunal found that the appellants had undisputedly paid 8% of the sale price of the exempted goods and that the earlier decisions in similar factual settings had held such payment to be equivalent to reversal of credit and sufficient compliance with the scheme of the rules. On that basis, denial of credit in addition to the 8% payment was held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to Modvat credit, and the demand for its reversal could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The orders of the Commissioner were set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a manufacturer of dutiable and exempted final products pays the amount prescribed under Rule 57CC in respect of exempted clearances, the requirement of Rule 57C is treated as satisfied and Modvat credit on the inputs cannot be denied on the ground that the goods were common inputs for both categories of final products.