Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of duty was sustainable where the assessee had reversed 8% Cenvat credit in respect of exempted clearances, and whether non-maintenance of separate accounts for common inputs justified denial of credit on dutiable clearances.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by an earlier final order in the assessee's own case. The Tribunal held that once 8% Cenvat credit had been reversed in respect of exempted goods, the availment of Modvat/Cenvat credit in relation to the dutiable goods remained justified. The absence of separate accounts for inputs used in exempted and dutiable goods was held to be irrelevant in the light of the earlier binding view, and the confirmation of demand could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The demand was not sustainable and the assessee was entitled to relief; the appeal was dismissed.