Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the land sold by the assessees was agricultural land on the date of sale and, if so, whether the capital gain arising from its transfer was exempt from tax.
Analysis: The character of land for capital gains purposes depends on a cumulative assessment of all relevant facts, with revenue classification, land revenue payment, actual user, surrounding circumstances, prior and intended user, permissions for non-agricultural use, location, and sale price all being relevant but none being conclusive by itself. On the facts, the land had not been cultivated for several years before sale, the assessees had agreed to sell it to a housing society for building purposes, had sought and obtained permission under the tenancy law for such transfer, and the land was sold soon thereafter at a price and in circumstances consistent with non-agricultural use. These factors outweighed the entries in the revenue records and past agricultural user.
Conclusion: The land was not agricultural land at the time of sale, and the resultant surplus was not exempt from capital gains tax; the finding was in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: The character of land for exemption purposes must be determined from the totality of circumstances on the date of transfer, and revenue entries or past agricultural use are not conclusive where the land has ceased to be intended or used for agricultural purposes.