Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the land sold by the assessee was agricultural land outside the definition of capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so as to exclude capital gains tax and render section 50C inapplicable.
Analysis: The land was supported by revenue records, a Tahsildar's certificate, and the sale agreement showing that it remained agricultural land, was situated beyond 8 kilometres from the municipal limits, and had not been converted for non-agricultural use. The Revenue did not bring contrary material to displace these findings. The matter was also found to be covered by the earlier coordinate bench decision in the assessee's spouse's case on identical facts. On these facts, the statutory exclusion for agricultural land applied and the deeming fiction under section 50C could not be invoked.
Conclusion: The land was not a capital asset and no capital gains tax arose from its transfer; the assessee succeeded on the merits.