TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds Commissioner's revision under Income Tax Act, emphasizing thorough inquiry into land nature</h1> <h3>Shri. Arjun Parthasarathy Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai III, Chennai.</h3> The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax's revision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, determining that the land in question was converted ... - Issues involved: The issues involved in this case are the revision of assessment u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961, regarding the treatment of land as agricultural or non-agricultural for the purpose of long term capital gains tax.Revision u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act:The appellant argued that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) wrongly revised the assessment under section 263 of the Act, claiming that the land in question was agricultural. The appellant cited various case laws to support their argument. On the other hand, the Revenue supported the revision order, stating that the Assessing Officer had incorrectly treated the land as agricultural.Nature of the Land and Assessment Details:The appellant, an individual, along with family members, sold land which was approved for non-agricultural use before the sale deed. The appellant's income for the assessment year included various sources like salary, business income, capital gains, and agricultural income. The Assessing Officer had initially accepted the income returned by the appellant.Reasoning for Revision by CIT:The CIT issued a notice under section 263, stating that the land had been converted for non-agricultural use before the sale, making it liable for capital gains tax. The CIT highlighted various documents and approvals related to the land's conversion and stamp duty implications.Judicial Analysis and Decision:The Tribunal analyzed the facts and arguments presented by both parties. It was noted that the land had indeed been approved for non-agricultural use before the sale deed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper inquiry by the Assessing Officer regarding the nature of the land. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal upheld the CIT's jurisdiction under section 263 for revising the assessment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the CIT had rightly exercised authority under section 263 of the Act.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT's revision of the assessment under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The decision was pronounced on August 13, 2013, in Chennai.
TaxTMI 
