Agricultural land and unreliable books: factual findings sustained, with surplus taxed and trading addition upheld.

Land sold in quick succession, with sale deeds recording conversion from agricultural to non-agricultural use, was treated as non-agricultural property; absent genuine agricultural activity, the surplus was held taxable rather than exempt under the agricultural land exclusion in Section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act. Separately, books of account were rejected under Section 145(3) because of non-genuine purchases, no proper stock register, and unverifiable opening and closing stock, and the resulting trading addition was sustained. The article notes that both findings were factual, supported by concurrent evidence, and not shown to be perverse, so no substantial question of law arose.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the surplus arising from sale of lands was assessable as business income or was exempt as transfer of agricultural land not constituting a capital asset under Section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether rejection of books of account under Section 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequent trading addition were justified.

Issue (i): Whether the surplus arising from sale of lands was assessable as business income or was exempt as transfer of agricultural land not constituting a capital asset under Section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The lands were sold in quick succession, and the sale deeds themselves recorded conversion of the land from agricultural to non-agricultural use. The material on record did not establish any genuine agricultural operations, and the factual finding was that the transactions were carried out with regularity and with an intention to earn income. The nature of the land was therefore held to be non-agricultural, and the finding was treated as one of fact not shown to be perverse.

Conclusion: The surplus was rightly treated as taxable income and the assessee was not entitled to the claim that the land was an agricultural asset outside the scope of Section 2(14)(iii).

Issue (ii): Whether rejection of books of account under Section 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequent trading addition were justified.

Analysis: The authorities found non-genuine purchases, absence of a proper stock register, and inability to verify opening and closing stock with supporting material. On that basis, the books were held unreliable and rejection under Section 145(3) was sustained. The trading addition was upheld as a factual determination supported by the record and by concurrent findings of the authorities below.

Conclusion: Rejection of the books of account and the trading addition were upheld.

Final Conclusion: No substantial question of law arose for interference, and the appeal failed on both the land-sale issue and the trading-addition issue.

Ratio Decidendi: Whether land is agricultural or non-agricultural and whether books of account are unreliable are primarily questions of fact, and concurrent factual findings will not be interfered with in second appeal unless shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence.

---