Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether explosives used in mines outside the cement factory for quarrying limestone, which was used in the manufacture of cement, qualified as inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The definition of input under Rule 57A, read with Rule 57F(1)(i), required the goods to be used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product and to be brought into the factory. The explosives were used outside the factory at the mines, were not brought into the cement factory, and were consumed in an activity anterior to manufacture. Rule 57F(3)(b) was inapplicable because there was no removal of inputs from the factory for manufacture of an intermediate product that was returned to the factory, and the limestone recovered by blasting was not an intermediate product containing the input. The mining activity was held not to be manufacture, and the cited authorities supporting an integrated-process theory under other statutes or on different facts did not assist the assessee.
Conclusion: The explosives did not qualify as inputs for Modvat credit, and the claim was rejected.