Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether explosives used for blasting mines to obtain ore, and not directly in the final manufacture of zinc concentrate, were covered by Notification No. 191/87 as goods used in the manufacture of zinc or lead concentrates.
Analysis: The relevant notification exempted goods falling in specified chapters when used in the manufacture of zinc or lead concentrates. The Court treated mining and subsequent processing as parts of one integrated operation for production of the concentrate. It relied on the established principle that where extraction and processing are interdependent, goods used in mining may be regarded as used in the manufacturing process if they are essential to obtaining the final concentrate. On that basis, the explosives used for blasting the mines were not viewed as remote from manufacture but as part of the integrated process leading to the concentrate.
Conclusion: The explosives satisfied the condition of use in the manufacture of zinc or lead concentrates, and the exemption under Notification No. 191/87 was available to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where mining and processing together form an integrated and interdependent process of production, goods used in mining may be treated as used in the manufacture of the final product for the purpose of a manufacturing exemption notification.