Appellate authority denies Input Tax Credit for cross-country pipeline expenses under CGST Act

The appellate authority upheld the AAR's ruling, denying the appellant's claim for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on GST paid for goods and services used for laying the cross-country pipeline and for Operation and Maintenance (O&M) services. The pipeline, considered immovable property, did not qualify as plant and machinery under the CGST Act. Consequently, the appeal by NMDC was dismissed due to the ineligibility of ITC for the mentioned expenses.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on GST paid for goods and services used for laying a cross-country pipeline.
2. Eligibility of ITC on Operation and Maintenance Services (O&M Services) for the maintenance of the facility.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Eligibility of ITC on GST Paid for Goods and Services Used for Laying a Cross-Country Pipeline

NMDC Limited, a state-controlled mineral producer, is setting up a 3 MTPA capacity greenfield Integrated Steel Plant in Nagarnar, Chhattisgarh, which includes the construction of an intake well, pump house, and cross-country pipeline system. The appellant sought advance ruling on whether ITC could be availed on GST paid for goods and services used for laying the pipeline from the river to the factory boundary.

The appellant argued that the pipeline is essential for transporting water, which is integral to the steel manufacturing process. They cited various case laws and provisions under the pre-GST regime, where pipelines used outside the factory for captive use were considered eligible for credit.

Section 16(1) of the CGST Act entitles registered persons to take credit of input tax charged on supplies used in the course or furtherance of business. However, Section 17(5) of the CGST Act restricts ITC on goods and services used for the construction of immovable property (other than plant and machinery), explicitly excluding pipelines laid outside the factory premises.

The appellate authority upheld the AAR's decision, stating that the pipeline laid outside the factory premises does not qualify as "plant and machinery" and is considered immovable property. The pipeline project is not directly related to the outward supply of goods, and thus, ITC on the same is not permissible.

Issue 2: Eligibility of ITC on Operation and Maintenance Services (O&M Services) for the Maintenance of the Facility

The appellant also sought ruling on the eligibility of ITC on GST paid for O&M services for the pipeline. They argued that there is no restriction under Section 17(5) on availing ITC for maintenance services of immovable property.

The appellate authority, however, found that the pipeline laid outside the factory premises is excluded from the definition of "plant and machinery." Therefore, ITC on O&M services for such pipelines is not permissible. The authority referenced various case laws pertaining to the erstwhile Cenvat/Modvat regime, which were found to be distinct and not applicable to the current GST provisions.

Conclusion:

The appellate authority upheld the AAR's ruling, denying the appellant's claim for ITC on GST paid for goods and services used for laying the cross-country pipeline and for O&M services. The pipeline laid outside the factory premises is considered immovable property and does not qualify as plant and machinery under the CGST Act. Therefore, the appeal filed by NMDC was found to be devoid of merit and was dismissed.

---