Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital goods installed at a water reservoir about one kilometre away from the factory were eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q as goods used in the factory, having regard to the definition of "factory" in Section 2(e) and the registration requirement under Rule 174.
Analysis: Rule 57Q allowed credit only on capital goods used in the factory. The expression "factory" in Section 2(e) was held to cover the premises and precincts where manufacture or a connected manufacturing process is carried on, but not a place outside the factory precincts. The reservoir site was neither part of the factory ground plan nor separately registered, and the drawing of water from a distant reservoir was not treated as a manufacturing process within the factory. The reasoning in the earlier decision denying credit for machinery used in a separate mining area was followed.
Conclusion: The pump installed at the reservoir was not capital goods used in the factory, so Modvat credit was inadmissible.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee and the denial of Modvat credit was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of Modvat credit, capital goods must be used within the factory premises or its precincts, and a facility located outside those limits does not qualify merely because it supplies an input required for manufacture.