Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether dumpers used for transporting limestone from the quarry to the crusher were eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The claim for credit was rejected by the lower authorities on the footing that the dumpers were only transport vehicles used before the manufacturing process commenced and were not used in the production or processing of the final product. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that activities integrally connected with manufacture, including the handling and transfer of raw material, form part of the manufacturing process. Material handling equipment had already been recognised as eligible capital goods where it is used in relation to manufacture, and the fact that the dumpers carried raw material to the crusher did not take them outside that principle. The objection that they were not used within the factory was also not accepted as the denial had not been founded on that basis.
Conclusion: Dumpers used for transporting raw material in relation to the manufacture of the final product were eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q and the disallowance was unsustainable.