1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal grants Modvat credit for essential manufacturing items, denies for non-essential equipment, aligning with case law</h1> The Tribunal allowed Modvat credit on eligible items such as electrical/electronic equipment, refractory items, and material handling equipment, deeming ... Modvat - Capital goods Issues involved: Appeal against denial of Modvat credit on various items claimed as capital goods.Electrical/electronic equipments and spares: The Tribunal held that items like cables, conductors, and spares for electric motors are eligible capital goods as they are essential for the proper working of machinery used in production, citing relevant case law.Refractory Items: Refractory bricks used for lining kilns were deemed eligible capital goods under Rule 57Q based on previous Tribunal decisions and the clarificatory nature of the amendment to the rule.Material Handling Equipment: Various equipment like fork lifts and conveyors were considered eligible for Modvat credit as they are integral to the manufacturing process, supported by previous Tribunal decisions and the necessity of such equipment in the production line.Pollution control equipment: Items claimed as pollution control equipment were not deemed directly involved in the manufacturing process, leading to the agreement with the Commissioner's decision to disallow credit on these items.Misc. Items: Certain items claimed as capital goods were found to be ancillary and not directly integral to the manufacturing process, resulting in the agreement with the Commissioner's decision to disallow credit on these miscellaneous items.The Tribunal modified the impugned order to allow Modvat credit on eligible items based on the discussions and findings, providing consequential benefits to the appellants in accordance with the law.