Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible under Rule 57A on explosives used for mining raw materials from mines situated away from the factory.
Analysis: The entitlement to credit was held to be governed by the Tribunal's Larger Bench decision, which had already decided the same question against the assessee. On that basis, the claimed nexus between the explosives and the manufacturing process was not accepted for Modvat purposes.
Conclusion: Modvat credit under Rule 57A was not admissible on the explosives used for mining the raw materials, and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was sustained and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the use of goods is for mining raw materials away from the factory and the question is covered by binding Larger Bench precedent, Modvat credit under Rule 57A is not available.