Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars can survive where the reassessment proceedings and consequential quantum additions have been quashed.
Analysis: The reassessment orders forming the foundation for the penalty proceedings had already been quashed in the assessee's quantum appeals. Consequently, the additions on which the penalty was founded did not subsist. In the absence of any surviving tax sought to be evaded within the meaning of the statutory explanation, levy of penalty was not justified.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not leviable; the deletion of penalty was sustained in favour of the assessee.