Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income could survive after the quantum additions forming its basis had been deleted.
Analysis: The quantum order had held the assessee eligible for exemption and directed deletion of the additions, including the disallowance of provision for guarantee claims. Consequently, there was no under-reported income or tax payable on such income, and the foundation as well as computational basis for penalty ceased to exist. Pendency of the Revenue's challenge to the quantum order could not justify sustaining the penalty. A subsequent prospective amendment was also irrelevant, since penalty had to be tested under the law applicable on the date of the alleged default.
Conclusion: The penalty under Section 270A was unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the quantum additions constituting the foundation for a penalty are deleted, penalty for under-reporting or misreporting based on those additions cannot be sustained.