<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1712 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470201</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive when the reassessment orders and the consequential quantum additions forming its foundation have been quashed. As no addition remained and no tax sought to be evaded survived under the relevant statutory explanation, levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unjustified. The penalty deletion was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1712 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470201</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot survive when the reassessment orders and the consequential quantum additions forming its foundation have been quashed. As no addition remained and no tax sought to be evaded survived under the relevant statutory explanation, levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unjustified. The penalty deletion was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>