Mistake apparent on record justified recall where cited precedents were not analysed; appeals restored for rehearing.

Omission to deal with cited precedents, including Orient Crafts and Carborandum, was treated as a mistake apparent on the face of the record because their ratio had been mentioned earlier but neither discussed nor distinguished. The Bench held that this deficiency justified recall of the final order, particularly in light of the disposal of the civil appeal before the Supreme Court. The miscellaneous applications were allowed, the final order was recalled, and the appeals were restored for fresh hearing and decision.

---

---

Issues: Whether the final order required rectification and recall on account of a mistake apparent on the face of the record in not dealing with the cited precedents and the applicability of the taxation of services rules governing services provided from outside India and received in India.

Analysis: The order records that the appellant had relied on the decision of the Delhi High Court in Orient Crafts and the decision of the Supreme Court in Carborandum, and that these authorities were mentioned in the earlier order but their ratio was neither discussed nor distinguished. The omission was treated as an oversight constituting a mistake apparent on the face of the record. On that basis, and in view of the disposal of the civil appeal before the Supreme Court, the Bench held that the earlier final order required recall so that the deficiency could be addressed.

Conclusion: The miscellaneous applications were allowed, the final order was recalled, and the appeals were restored to their original number for hearing and decision.

---