https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469776 Omission to deal with cited precedents, including Orient Crafts and Carborandum, was treated as a mistake apparent on the face of the record because their ratio had been mentioned earlier but neither discussed nor distinguished. The Bench held that this deficiency justified recall of the final order, particularly in light of the disposal of the civil appeal before the Supreme Court. The miscellaneous applications were allowed, the final order was recalled, and the appeals were restored for fresh hearing and decision. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jul 2026 19:00:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469776 Omission to deal with cited precedents, including Orient Crafts and Carborandum, was treated as a mistake apparent on the face of the record because their ratio had been mentioned earlier but neither discussed nor distinguished. The Bench held that this deficiency justified recall of the final order, particularly in light of the disposal of the civil appeal before the Supreme Court. The miscellaneous applications were allowed, the final order was recalled, and the appeals were restored for fresh hearing and decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469776