Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's grievance should be remitted to the respondent authorities for consideration by way of representation with directions for time-bound decision, rather than being adjudicated on merits by this Court.
Analysis: The petitioner's grievance has not been finally rejected by the respondent authorities and the parties sought a course permitting administrative reconsideration. A time-bound mechanism for submission of a detailed representation by the petitioner and subsequent consideration and decision by the respondent authorities was proposed to potentially render the writ petition unnecessary. The Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation within three weeks and directed respondent no. 3, in consultation with respondent no. 2, to decide the representation within eight weeks of receipt, while preserving the petitioner's right to approach the Court if aggrieved by the administrative decision. The Court expressly did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute.
Conclusion: The petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to prefer a detailed representation within three weeks and directing the respondent authorities to decide the representation within eight weeks; the petitioner may approach the Court thereafter if aggrieved. No decision on merits was made in favour of either party.