Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assignment and transfer of leasehold rights in GIDC land for consideration constitutes a supply of service exigible to GST under the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, or whether it is a transfer of immovable property /outside the scope of supply.
Analysis: The dispute was governed by the statutory scheme of scope of supply under Section 7(1)(a), levy under Section 9, and the treatment of immovable property and lease-related transactions under the GST framework. The Court followed its earlier decision holding that a long-term lease granted by GIDC is a supply of service, but an absolute assignment by the lessee in favour of a third-party assignee divests the lessee of all rights and operates as a transfer of benefits arising from immovable property. On that reasoning, such assignment is not merely use or enjoyment of property; it is transfer of the leasehold interest itself, which is treated as immovable property and falls outside the taxable net of supply of services. Consequently, the show-cause proceedings and the resultant demand based on the same transaction could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The transaction of assignment of leasehold rights was held not to be liable to GST under Section 7(1)(a) read with the relevant Schedules, and the impugned demand order was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Absolute transfer of leasehold rights in immovable property by the lessee to an assignee is not a supply of service under the GST law and is not exigible to GST.