Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (2) TMI 1347 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        TDS non-deduction on interest to NBFCs: three payments accepted as taxed, fourth remitted for verification and possible disallowance Non-deduction of TDS on interest paid to NBFCs raised disallowance of 30% of interest under disallowance rules for non-withholding; tribunal relied on ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            TDS non-deduction on interest to NBFCs: three payments accepted as taxed, fourth remitted for verification and possible disallowance

                            Non-deduction of TDS on interest paid to NBFCs raised disallowance of 30% of interest under disallowance rules for non-withholding; tribunal relied on precedent that where the payee has included the receipt in its return and paid tax, the payer cannot be saddled with disallowance, resulting in deletion of disallowance for three NBFCs as they produced evidence of income inclusion and tax payment. For payments to the fourth NBFC, absence of documentary proof of the payees tax treatment led to remand to the assessing officer to verify whether the payee accounted for and paid tax on the interest; matter partly allowed.




                            Issues: (i) Whether expenditure by way of interest can be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) where the recipients have included such receipts in their returns and paid tax thereon (substantiated by Form 26A); (ii) Whether disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) can be sustained in respect of a recipient for whom the assessee has not furnished Form 26A/ITR or other conclusive evidence of tax having been paid.

                            Issue (i): Whether interest payments to certain recipients should be disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) despite production of Form 26A and evidence that recipients included the receipts in their returns and paid tax.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal examined whether the requirements of the proviso to section 40(a)(ia) are satisfied by production of Form 26A and other documentary evidence showing that recipients included the amounts in their taxable income and paid tax. The Tribunal relied on settled authority holding that where the payee has already paid tax on the income received, the deductor should not be subjected to recovery or disallowance under withholding provisions; it also considered relevant Tribunal decisions applying the principle and procedural provisions (including electronic filing procedures under CBDT Notification No. 11 of 2016) governing Form 26A and related compliance.

                            Conclusion: In favour of the Assessee. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) cannot be made in respect of interest payments where the recipients have included the receipts in their returns and paid tax thereon, substantiated by Form 26A and supporting documents; the AO is directed to delete such additions and modify the assessment accordingly.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) should be sustained in respect of interest paid to a recipient for whom the assessee failed to produce Form 26A/ITR or equivalent conclusive evidence that tax has been paid by the recipient.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal considered the absence of concrete documentary evidence (Form 26A/ITR) for the specific recipient and the legal requirement that the payee's inclusion and payment of tax be demonstrated to invoke the proviso preventing disallowance. The Tribunal noted that where such evidence is not available, the AO must verify the factual position of whether the recipient has accounted for and paid tax on the receipt before deleting the disallowance.

                            Conclusion: Against the Assessee on the present record. The issue is remitted to the Assessing Officer for verification of whether the recipient accounted for and paid tax on the interest; the AO shall examine available records and any further documents the assessee may furnish and modify the assessment after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.

                            Final Conclusion: The appeal is partly allowed: disallowances are set aside in respect of payments where the recipients have proved inclusion and payment of tax; the assessment is restored to the AO for verification in respect of the recipient lacking such proof.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Where a recipient of income has included the amount in its return and paid tax thereon (substantiated by Form 26A or equivalent evidence), the proviso to section 40(a)(ia) precludes disallowance of the corresponding expenditure against the deductor; absent such proof for a particular recipient, the issue must be verified by the Assessing Officer.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found