Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment framed under Section 153A was liable to be quashed on the ground that approval under Section 153D was granted mechanically and without application of mind.
Analysis: The approval note granted by the approving authority covered multiple cases and assessment years in a single communication and did not indicate any examination of the draft assessment order, assessment records, or seized material. The approval was therefore treated as an omnibus and ritualistic sanction rather than an independent consideration of each assessment year. In such a situation, the statutory safeguard under Section 153D is not satisfied, and the assessment based on such approval cannot stand.
Conclusion: The approval under Section 153D was invalid for want of application of mind, and the assessment order was quashed. The issue is decided in favour of the assessee.