Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether royalty received from non-resident OEMs located outside India and having no permanent establishment in India was taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The disputed addition related only to royalty from foreign OEMs, while royalty from Indian-resident licensees was not in issue. The Tribunal noted that in the assessee's earlier and later years, identical facts had already been examined by coordinate benches, which held that royalty from OEMs outside India was not taxable where the manufacturing activity and use of the patents occurred outside India and the Revenue had not brought material to establish taxable presence or accrual in India for the impugned years. The assessment for the years under appeal was also based largely on earlier orders that had subsequently been reversed or held unsustainable on the same issue. Grounds relating to reopening, approval, interest, and penalty were either not argued or consequential and did not require separate adjudication.
Conclusion: The royalty addition under section 9(1)(vi)(c) was not sustainable and was directed to be deleted; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.