Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (4) TMI 1362 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Royalty taxability turns on India nexus and copyright rights: payments for offshore patent use and copyrighted articles were not taxable. Royalty from non-resident OEMs for CDMA patents used to manufacture handsets and network equipment outside India was held not taxable in India under ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Royalty taxability turns on India nexus and copyright rights: payments for offshore patent use and copyrighted articles were not taxable.

                          Royalty from non-resident OEMs for CDMA patents used to manufacture handsets and network equipment outside India was held not taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi)(c), because the Revenue did not show that the OEMs carried on business in India or that the source of the royalty was in India; the treaty issue therefore became unnecessary. Receipts under the BREW operator and carrier agreements were also held not to be royalty, since they were consideration for use of a copyrighted article and did not involve transfer of copyright rights. The challenge to initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was premature because no final penalty order had yet been made.




                          Issues: (i) whether royalty received from non-resident OEMs for CDMA patents used in manufacture of handsets and network equipment outside India was taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and article 12(7)(b) of the India-US DTAA; (ii) whether receipts under the BREW operator agreement and BREW carrier agreement were taxable as royalty in India; and (iii) whether the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be interfered with.

                          Issue (i): whether royalty received from non-resident OEMs for CDMA patents used in manufacture of handsets and network equipment outside India was taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and article 12(7)(b) of the India-US DTAA.

                          Analysis: Section 9(1)(vi)(c) is a deeming provision and, where revenue seeks to invoke it, the burden lies on the Revenue to show that the non-resident payer carried on business in India or used the licensed right for earning income from a source in India. The record did not show that the OEMs carried on CDMA-related business in India, that the patented technology was used in India for such business, or that the source of the royalty lay in India. The OEMs manufactured the products outside India and sold them outside India; the mere fact that products reached Indian carriers or were customised for Indian use did not convert the transaction into business in India or source in India. Following the earlier coordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case, the royalty could not be taxed merely because the products were sold in India.

                          Conclusion: The royalty from OEMs was not taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi)(c), and the treaty question became unnecessary.

                          Issue (ii): whether receipts under the BREW operator agreement and BREW carrier agreement were taxable as royalty in India.

                          Analysis: The BREW receipts were held to be consideration for a copyrighted article and not for transfer of copyright rights. The licence enabled use of software only as an integral part of the product, without transfer of any independent right in the copyright. Applying the jurisdictional High Court's distinction between copyrighted article and copyright right, the payment did not amount to royalty.

                          Conclusion: The BREW receipts were not taxable as royalty in India.

                          Issue (iii): whether the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be interfered with.

                          Analysis: The penalty initiation was only at a preliminary stage and no final penalty determination had been made.

                          Conclusion: The challenge to penalty initiation was premature.

                          Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained relief on the substantive royalty additions, while the penalty-related ground failed as premature; the Revenue's challenge to interest also failed.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Royalty paid to a non-resident for exploitation of patents used to manufacture products outside India is not taxable under section 9(1)(vi)(c) unless the Revenue proves that the payer carried on business in India or earned income from a source in India through use of the licensed right in India; a payment for use of a copyrighted article, without transfer of copyright rights, is not royalty.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found