Penalty u/s 270A stayed due to Section 275 bar while assessment appeals remain pending for assessee

HC held that, in view of Section 275 of the I.T. Act, there is a statutory bar on passing penalty orders while an appeal against the assessment order is pending. Relying on its earlier decision in an analogous matter, the HC held that the tax authorities could not lawfully proceed with penalty under Section 270A during the pendency of the assessee's appeals. The writ petition was allowed to the extent that the impugned penalty orders and consequential demand notices were directed to be kept in abeyance until disposal of the pending appeals.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

1.1 Whether, in view of Section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the respondents could proceed to pass and enforce penalty orders under Sections 270A and 272A(1)(d) and consequential demand notices, when an appeal against the assessment order for the same assessment year was pending before the Appellate Authority.

1.2 Whether the appropriate relief in such circumstances is to quash the impugned penalty orders and demand notices or to keep them in abeyance till disposal of the pending appeals.

---

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1: Validity of passing and enforcing penalty orders during pendency of appeal against assessment order

Legal framework

2.1 The Court referred to Section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and observed that it contains a clear embargo/bar on proceeding to pass a penalty order where an appeal against the assessment order is pending.

Interpretation and reasoning

2.2 The petitioner had filed an appeal on 12.05.2023 against the assessment order dated 30.03.2023 for the relevant assessment year. Notwithstanding this pendency, the respondents issued penalty notices and thereafter passed the impugned penalty orders under Sections 270A and 272A(1)(d), along with demand notices under Section 156.

2.3 The petitioner contended that, in light of the pendency of the appeal, the penalty proceedings and enforcement of the resulting orders and demands must be kept in abeyance till disposal of the appeal, relying on a prior decision of the Court in a case where, under identical circumstances, the Court had directed that penalty orders and notices be kept in abeyance till disposal of the assessee's appeals.

2.4 The respondents argued that the impugned penalty orders themselves are appealable and therefore need not be kept in abeyance merely because an appeal against the assessment order is pending.

2.5 The Court, upon perusal of Section 275, held that it imposes a clear restriction on passing penalty orders when an appeal against the assessment order is pending. It treated the present case as being on identical footing with the earlier precedent relied upon by the petitioner and applied the same principle.

Conclusions

2.6 The Court held that, in view of Section 275 and the earlier binding precedent, it is necessary to keep the impugned penalty orders under Sections 270A and 272A(1)(d) and the consequential demand notices in abeyance until disposal of the pending appeals against the assessment order for the same assessment year.

Issue 2: Nature of relief - quashing versus keeping in abeyance

Interpretation and reasoning

2.7 Although the petitioner sought quashing of the penalty orders and demand notices, the Court, following the approach adopted in the earlier decision rendered under identical circumstances, considered that the appropriate course was not to annul the penalty orders and notices, but to suspend their operation during the pendency of the assessee's appeals.

2.8 The Court also recognized that the respondents retain statutory rights to proceed with the penalty matters subject to the outcome of the appeals against the assessment order.

Conclusions

2.9 The writ petition was allowed to the limited extent that the impugned penalty orders and demand notices are to be kept in abeyance till disposal of the appeals filed by the petitioner against the assessment order.

2.10 Liberty was expressly reserved in favour of the respondents to proceed further in relation to the penalty proceedings after disposal of the assessee's appeals, thereby preserving the validity of the penalty orders subject to the final outcome of the appellate process.

---