Penalty demand and appeal verification under income tax were quashed, with fresh consideration left open after checking appeal validity.

Penalty proceedings and the consequential demand under the Income-tax Act were questioned because the assessee said a valid appeal had already been filed against the assessment order. The assessee relied on the appeal acknowledgement and Form 35, while the department raised objections about the acknowledgement and the appeal's validity. The court treated the matter as requiring verification rather than a hyper-technical rejection and held that the penalty order and demand could not stand on the existing record. The penalty issue was left open for fresh decision after confirming whether a valid appeal had in fact been filed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the penalty order and consequential demand could be sustained when the assessee asserted that a valid appeal had been filed against the assessment order.

Analysis: The assessment order had been followed by notice and penalty action under the Income-tax Act. The assessee produced the appeal acknowledgement and Form 35 to show that the appellate remedy had been invoked for the relevant assessment year. The controversy was whether the departmental objection regarding the acknowledgement and the validity of the appeal should defeat the assessee's plea, or whether the matter required verification without a hyper-technical approach.

Conclusion: The penalty order and the consequential demand were quashed, and the issue of penalty was left open for fresh decision after verification of whether a valid appeal had in fact been filed.

---