Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of tax at source under section 195, and the treatment of reimbursement of salary costs and other expenditure under Article 13 of the India-UK Treaty, were liable to be decided in favour of the revenue or the assessee.
Analysis: The questions raised in the revenue's appeal were found to have already been answered in favour of the assessee by an earlier judgment. On that basis, the Court treated the substantial questions of law as concluded against the revenue. The objection regarding limitation was not decided and was kept open.
Conclusion: The substantial questions of law were answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.