Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made under a secondment arrangement and reimbursement of costs to the foreign entity constituted fees for technical services chargeable to tax in India so as to require deduction of tax at source and attract liability under sections 195 and 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The arrangement was found to be a secondment contract under which the deputed personnel worked under the control, direction and supervision of the assessee. The reimbursed expenditure related to costs incurred by the foreign entity and did not retain the character of consideration for technical services. On these facts, the payments were not treated as fees for technical services within the meaning of section 9(1)(vii), and there was no obligation to deduct tax at source on such reimbursement. The Court also held that the foreign decision relied on by the revenue was distinguishable because the issue of permanent establishment was not involved in the present case.
Conclusion: The payment was not chargeable as fees for technical services, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source, and the assessee could not be treated as in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.