Reassessment notice beyond Section 149(1) limitation period held invalid despite Revenue's Section 150 arguments

The Delhi HC held that a reassessment notice issued beyond the limitation period under Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act was invalid. The Revenue argued the notice was valid under Section 150's non-obstante clause, claiming it was based on findings and directions from the SC decision in Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd., which permitted reassessment proceedings even in search-related cases under Section 132. However, the HC rejected this contention, following its earlier decision in ARN Infrastructures India Ltd., where a similar argument was dismissed. The court ruled that the SC decision in Abhisar Buildwell did not constitute a finding or direction justifying notices beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 149, making the impugned notice time-barred and invalid.

---

---

ISSUES:

Whether a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be validly issued in respect of a completed assessment year when no incriminating material was found during a search under Section 132.Whether the limitation period prescribed under Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act can be extended or overridden by invoking Section 150 of the Act based on directions or findings in the Supreme Court decision in Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.The scope and applicability of the Supreme Court's decision in Abhisar Buildwell regarding reassessment powers under Sections 147/148 in cases related to search and seizure under Section 132.Whether the issuance of a notice under Section 148A(b) and subsequent reopening of assessment complies with statutory requirements in the absence of a Supreme Court direction.

RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

The issuance of a notice under Section 148 in respect of a completed assessment year without discovery of incriminating material during search is without jurisdiction and contrary to settled legal principles.The limitation period under Section 149(1) is mandatory and cannot be extended or overridden merely by reliance on Section 150 or purported findings/directions in the Supreme Court decision in Abhisar Buildwell.The Supreme Court in Abhisar Buildwell held that reassessment powers under Sections 147/148 remain subject to fulfillment of statutory conditions and cannot be exercised as a "carte blanche" to override Section 149 limitations.The reassessment proceedings initiated without a Supreme Court direction and beyond the prescribed limitation period are invalid; Section 150(1) does not apply absent such direction.

RATIONALE:

The Court applied the statutory framework of the Income Tax Act, particularly Sections 132, 147, 148, 149, and 150, and relied on the Supreme Court's authoritative interpretation in Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.The Court emphasized that the power to reopen assessments under Sections 147/148 is "subject to fulfilment of the conditions mentioned in Sections 147/148 of the Act" and that the limitation period under Section 149 is a statutory bar unless expressly overridden by a Supreme Court direction under Section 150.The Court referred to its own precedent rejecting the contention that the Supreme Court's observations in Abhisar Buildwell constitute a general direction permitting reassessment beyond limitation without compliance with statutory conditions.The decision clarifies that the Supreme Court's ruling preserves the Revenue's power to reassess but does not dispense with the statutory safeguards and limitation periods, thus rejecting any doctrinal shift towards unrestricted reassessment post-search in absence of incriminating material.

---