Reassessment notices under Section 148 quashed as time-barred under Section 149 despite Abhisar Buildwell ruling

Delhi HC quashed reassessment notices under Section 148, ruling that proceedings initiated after Finance Act 2021 following Supreme Court's Abhisar Buildwell decision were time-barred under Section 149. The court held that while Abhisar Buildwell permitted reassessment after annulment of search assessments, such action must comply with statutory time limits. The First Proviso to Section 149(1) mandates reassessments for assessment years prior to April 1, 2021 must conform to pre-Finance Act 2021 time frames. Revenue's failure to initiate timely reassessment despite clear legal position rendered the notices invalid.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reassessment action post-Supreme Court decision in Abhisar Buildwell.
2. Limitation period for reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Interpretation of "finding or direction" under Section 150 of the Income Tax Act.
4. Impact of CBDT Instruction No. 1/2023 on reassessment proceedings.
5. Applicability of Supreme Court's observations in Abhisar Buildwell to reassessment actions.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of reassessment action post-Supreme Court decision in Abhisar Buildwell:
The batch of writ petitions challenged the reassessment proceedings initiated after the Supreme Court's decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 v. Abhisar Buildwell Private Limited. The petitioners argued that the reassessment action was barred by time and did not meet the pre-conditions introduced by the First Proviso to Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Buildwell held that no additions could be made in respect of completed or unabated assessments in the absence of any incriminating material found during a search. The Court also allowed for reassessment under Sections 147/148 if conditions mentioned therein were fulfilled.

2. Limitation period for reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The petitioners contended that the reassessment action initiated after the promulgation of the Finance Act, 2021, did not qualify the pre-conditions of the First Proviso to Section 149(1). The Court noted that the First Proviso to Section 149(1) compels the validity of reassessment to be tested based on the time limits specified under Sections 149, 153A, and 153C as they stood immediately before the commencement of the Finance Act, 2021. The Court found that the notices under Section 148 fell beyond the date computed in terms of the First Proviso to Section 149(1).

3. Interpretation of "finding or direction" under Section 150 of the Income Tax Act:
The petitioners argued that the Supreme Court's observations in Abhisar Buildwell did not constitute a "finding or direction" as contemplated under Section 150. The Court referred to the Constitution Bench judgment in Income Tax Officer, A Ward, Sitapur v. Murlidhar Bhagwan Das, which explained that a "finding" is a conclusion on a material question necessary for the disposal of the appeal, and a "direction" is one which the appellate authority is empowered to give under the Act. The Court concluded that the observations in Abhisar Buildwell did not amount to a finding or direction enabling the respondents to overcome the statutory prescription of limitation.

4. Impact of CBDT Instruction No. 1/2023 on reassessment proceedings:
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued Instruction No. 1/2023 following the Supreme Court's decision in Abhisar Buildwell, directing Assessing Officers (AOs) to re-examine all search assessment cases annulled by the Tribunal or High Courts and consider the feasibility of commencing reassessment action. The Court noted that the CBDT Instruction emphasized that completed assessments could be reopened under Sections 147/148, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions mentioned therein. However, the Court found that the Instruction did not override the statutory prescriptions of limitation.

5. Applicability of Supreme Court's observations in Abhisar Buildwell to reassessment actions:
The Supreme Court in Abhisar Buildwell observed that the annulment of search assessments would not deprive the Revenue of its power to reassess, subject to the reassessment being in accordance with the law. The Court clarified that these observations did not constitute a carte blanche for the respondents to override the limitations prescribed under Section 149. The Court emphasized that the power to reassess must be exercised in compliance with the statutory conditions and limitations.

Conclusion:
The Court quashed the impugned notices under Section 148 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, finding that the reassessment actions were barred by limitation and not in accordance with the statutory prescriptions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

---