TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Granted: Interim Order of 24th June 2024 Confirmed, Bonds Required Under Section 88 of CrPC 1973</h1> <h3>Bijay Ketan Sahoo Versus Enforcement Directorate</h3> The SC allowed the appeal, confirming the interim order dated 24th June 2024 as absolute, based on the precedent set in 'Tarsem Lal vs. Directorate of ... Money Laundering - HELD THAT:- The case is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Tarsem Lal vs. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office [2024 (5) TMI 837 - SUPREME COURT]. Hence, the interim order dated 24th June, 2024 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. The Special Court may direct the appellant to furnish bonds for appearance in accordance with Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 91 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita). Appeal allowed. Leave granted. The case is held to be covered by the decision in 'Tarsem Lal vs. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office', 2024 SCC Online SC 971. Consequently, 'the interim order dated 24th June, 2024 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions.' The Special Court may direct the appellant to furnish bonds for appearance in accordance with Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 91 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita). The appeal is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
