https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461351 An interim order was continued on the same terms because the matter was treated as covered by an earlier decision of the Court, and the appeal was allowed. The Court also clarified that a Special Court may require the appellant to furnish bonds for appearance under the relevant criminal procedure provision, leaving that direction to be made in accordance with law. The operative effect was that the interim protection became absolute, while the appearance-bond question remained open for the Special Court to address within the applicable procedural framework. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:23:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461351 An interim order was continued on the same terms because the matter was treated as covered by an earlier decision of the Court, and the appeal was allowed. The Court also clarified that a Special Court may require the appellant to furnish bonds for appearance under the relevant criminal procedure provision, leaving that direction to be made in accordance with law. The operative effect was that the interim protection became absolute, while the appearance-bond question remained open for the Special Court to address within the applicable procedural framework. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461351