Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal proceedings were liable to be quashed on the ground that the allegations did not disclose the ingredients of the offences and were attended with mala fides.
Analysis: The allegations were tested against the material placed before the Court. For the offence under Section 294(b) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the complaint did not disclose any obscene words uttered to the annoyance of others. For the offence under Section 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the record did not show a real and credible threat. For the offence under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the physical condition and disability of the first petitioner made the prosecution version inherently improbable. The surrounding civil disputes and prior proceedings also indicated that the criminal case had been set in motion with an ulterior motive.
Conclusion: The proceedings were found to be an abuse of process of law and liable to be quashed in exercise of inherent jurisdiction.
Final Conclusion: The criminal case could not be sustained and the petitioners obtained quashing of the prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi: Criminal proceedings may be quashed where the allegations are inherently improbable, do not satisfy the essential ingredients of the alleged offences, and are found to be maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive.