Company restoration from strike-off allowed subject to costs and compliance with overdue statutory filings

A company struck off the Register of Companies was restored under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 because the restoration petition was filed within the statutory period and the record showed service of notices at the correct registered address, a response by the company, and later filing of outstanding returns and balance sheets. The Court accepted that restoration was justified in the interests of justice, particularly as the company claimed continuing operations and assets requiring restoration to deal with its property. Restoration was made conditional on payment of costs and compliance with pending statutory filings and formalities, with liberty reserved for penal action for default under Section 162.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the petitioner company's name, which had been struck off the Register of Companies, was liable to be restored under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. (ii) Whether restoration should be made subject to costs and compliance with outstanding statutory filings and formalities.

Issue (i): Whether the petitioner company's name, which had been struck off the Register of Companies, was liable to be restored under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Analysis: The company had been struck off for non-filing of returns and balance sheets, but the petition for restoration was filed within the prescribed 20-year period. The record showed that statutory notices under Section 560 had been issued to the company at its correct registered address, and the petitioner had in fact responded and later filed the outstanding returns and balance sheets. The company also asserted that it remained in operation and had assets requiring restoration to enable dealing with its property. On these facts, restoration was considered justified in the interests of justice.

Conclusion: The company's name was directed to be restored to the Register under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Issue (ii): Whether restoration should be made subject to costs and compliance with outstanding statutory filings and formalities.

Analysis: Rule 94 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 contemplates costs ordinarily being borne by the petitioner, though the Court may order otherwise in appropriate circumstances. Considering the defaults and the facts of the case, restoration was made conditional upon payment of costs, filing of all outstanding statutory documents, and completion of requisite formalities, while preserving liberty to the respondent to take penal action for any statutory default under Section 162 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Conclusion: Restoration was made conditional upon payment of costs and compliance with outstanding statutory requirements, with liberty reserved for penal action under Section 162 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded and the company was directed to be restored to the Register, subject to specified costs and statutory compliances.

Ratio Decidendi: A company struck off from the register may be restored within the statutory period where restoration is justified on the facts, and the Court may impose costs and compliance conditions while exercising its discretion under the relevant restoration framework.

---