<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1302 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458467</link>
    <description>A company struck off the Register of Companies was restored under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 because the restoration petition was filed within the statutory period and the record showed service of notices at the correct registered address, a response by the company, and later filing of outstanding returns and balance sheets. The Court accepted that restoration was justified in the interests of justice, particularly as the company claimed continuing operations and assets requiring restoration to deal with its property. Restoration was made conditional on payment of costs and compliance with pending statutory filings and formalities, with liberty reserved for penal action for default under Section 162.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1302 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458467</link>
      <description>A company struck off the Register of Companies was restored under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 because the restoration petition was filed within the statutory period and the record showed service of notices at the correct registered address, a response by the company, and later filing of outstanding returns and balance sheets. The Court accepted that restoration was justified in the interests of justice, particularly as the company claimed continuing operations and assets requiring restoration to deal with its property. Restoration was made conditional on payment of costs and compliance with pending statutory filings and formalities, with liberty reserved for penal action for default under Section 162.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>