Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purposes of Section 15 of the Customs Act, 1962, the relevant date for determining the rate of duty on imported goods is the date of presentation of the bill of entry or the date of the vessel's entry inwards.
Analysis: Section 15(1)(a) makes the presentation of the bill of entry the normal relevant date, but the proviso deems an earlier-presented bill to have been presented on the date of entry inwards of the vessel. The expression "entry inwards" was construed in the setting of Sections 30 and 31, which link unloading to the grant of entry inwards after filing of the import manifest. Reading those provisions with Sections 7 and 8, and having regard to the practical conditions of unloading in the Madras harbour, the Court held that the statutory reference was to the actual entry of the vessel into the harbour and not to its earlier presence at outer anchorage or within port limits. The earlier Sea Customs Act provisions did not alter this conclusion under the Customs Act, 1962.
Conclusion: The date of entry inwards for Section 15 was 23-12-1966, so the bill of entry filed earlier was deemed presented on that date and the duty collected was valid.